Saturday, September 5, 2009

History

Please do not consider me to be a racist or anything of the sort because I'm not. Before jumping on my blog and calling me a hater and stuff, please wait and try to see the point of view I am coming from. In other words, do not be hasty.

So the question that was brought up during the discussion on Wednesday was if minorities were represented enough in U.S history. A minority is considered a cultural group that is smaller compared to the rest of the population. They represent a small percentage of the mass population. Now that percentage can change in certain areas of the U.S. Like Latinos are a minority in Maine but are the majority in New Mexico or other areas in the Southern U.S.

American history begins with colonial time. But it can also be considered even earlier than that when Leif Ericson landed in North America 500 years before Columbus. History could include the Native tribes that were occupying America. But the U.S History that students are required to learn are about how the U.S became a unifying group. That unifying group first settled and were the Pilgrims and other "religious" groups. The current textbooks are not pushing for religion to be the center of history- but it sure did have some effect on our foundation. In order to talk about a specific group or culture, their habits, beliefs, and customs must be discussed. Now back to the minority subject. Yes, minorities were around when the U.S was being shaped. But Anglo-Saxons were minorities when thy first came to America. The Native Americas had a larger population than the settlers. So why should not talk about the settlers?

Yes, the U.S is arrogant and only wants to talk about the settlers than the Native Americans. But the U.S history textbook would be extremely long and students would be dropping out of school at age 13. Publishers and other writers of history books cannot include every single detail about cultural groups in one book. So a group of people come together and discuss about what should and should not be in U.S history books. Yes, it is somewhat wrong that they are deciding on what we learn in schools. But like we could do it better.

Every person would want something that appeals to them because of their background and experiences. That is why there are some books that we like and some that we hate. I, for one, would love more stuff in our history books about Minnesota. That is where I am from. There is nothing about Minnesota in history books. Because we were not really involved in the Civil War.... We were trying to keep warm from blizzards. There is hardly any stuff in our history books about Scandinavians either. We all want something different in our history books. Some people want more religious stuff because it pertains to them and they are curious. Its not that they are forcing it upon people, people want to share their culture to others. People want to show their beliefs, customs, and history.

America was settled on the eastern coast. As the settlers grew and became a little more daring (or crazy) they migrated West. Yes, there were Native American that were around and the settlers did cruel things to them. It is written in our history books about some of the cruel things they have done. But they are not discussed much in our books because they were to part of the U.S. They were considered an independent nation. But when you look and actually read the text book, you will see that African Americans become more represented in history in the 1800s. Same with other groups. As America got bigger, "minorities" are discussed more in history. Its like if you want to be known to every person on your school campus, you have to do something big. Then you will forever be remembered at your school. But if you do not do anything and you are just a part to the school population, then you are forgotten.

To sum this blog up for the people reading, the people who are writing our history books are only doing what every human would. Excluding some things from history. It does not mean that they are forgotten or are nothing. Different cultures talk about their own family history to their own children. I know some of Minnesota's history because I lived there and because of my family. There are just certain basic things that we must know. People are only thinking of themselves and only want people to know about certain things in history. But stories do go on orally or written down. We do have history books that are devoted to certain cultural groups. We have not forgotten those small groups that did contribute to America.

So thank you for taking you precious time to read my blog.

1 comment:

  1. Connie, hello!
    I like your blog. You did a good job. I must say I agree with you on the whole minority bit. I think that, as long as the history books are history book-sized, and don't contain all the history there is, those who will be most prominent in the books are going to be those who had the greatest impact on the time. That's how it goes. Anyways, good job, good job. Hooray for Minnesota!
    -Cathy!

    ReplyDelete