Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Marriage Poems

Connie Benjamin

Per 4


Marriage

The two poems “A Valediction” and “Conjoined” have the subject of separation happens in marriage and being too close can hinder growth between the couple by using metaphors and diction. The poem “A Valediction,” by John Donne, is about a couple that will experience separation because one of them is leaving. The lover that is leaving consoles his companion by using metaphors to express how their love is much more than physical by using expressive metaphors and having an encouraging tone. In the poem “Conjoined,” by Judith Minty, a wife tells how the marriage that she is in hinders and is a problem by using three metaphors and negative connotation to show the ugliness of the marriage.


The poem “A Valediction” uses expressive metaphors to display how a bond between two people in love knows no distance. The speaker wants the separation to be accepted and for the couple not to mourn. He compares the sadness that they should have to be similar to, “Virtuous men pass mildly away.” The separation is to be accepted because it is inevitable and is not to mourned over. The noble men in the metaphor do not mourn over the death of their friend because death is inevitable and is a fact of life. People do die and although the men are solemn because of the loss of their friend, they do not publicly mourn in the streets or go into a state of depression. The speaker does not want his companion to mourn over his absence because his departure is inevitable. This metaphor consoles his companion and offers hope that they will soon be reunited. They will be reunited just as the noble men will be reunited in Heaven. Their love is of greater value and matured because they can handle the separation. The speaker has a tone of encouragement and loving because of statements such as, "Our souls therefore, which are one" and "So let us melt and make no noise." There is no negative words or harsh words in the poem. However, in the poem “Conjoined,” the speaker believes that the closeness that the couple has is hindering their growth and how there is a need for separation. The speaker uses a metaphor as a comparison to their marriage. The speaker uses a negative object as comparison to the problem in the relationship, “The onion in my cupboard, a monster... Two joined under one transparent skin: each half-round, then flat and deformed.” The couple never got the develop or grow to their fullest because they are under this tough skin called marriage. Their relationship is not working because they are pushing against each other to grow and find themselves. They did not find their individuality because they are in a bound. Thus, separation seems to be the answer to the speaker so they can grow to their fullest. The choice of an onion is negative and gives the reader a sour description because the aroma of an onion is pungent. The speaker sees the problem in her marriage and compares it to a deformed onion because it is unnatural and is very noticeable because of the aroma. The connotation in the first stanza is negative with words like “monster” and “deformed” the speaker is disgusted with how the marriage is working and the reader is disgusted because of how it is described. The speaker sees her marriage as having tow individual people forced to be conjoined under marriage. They have not conformed to one another because they are unwilling. Therefore, they are suffocating each other.


Donne uses geometric metaphors to display how the couple’s love will be strong despite the separation. The speaker must leave his companion and compares his travels away from his companion to a compass, “As stiff twin compasses are two; thy soul, the fixt foot, makes no show to move, but doth, if th’ other do.” The couple is joined by marriage and the compass’ two legs are joined well. With a compass one leg stays is fixed and the other is free to move to make a perfect circle. The speaker sees his marriage as that compass. That his spouse will stay in one spot and where ever he may go, he will always be connected to his spouse and thus creating a perfect circle because of their union. Their love can handle the distance because of the union that they have and that their love transcends the merely physical. This metaphor describes the couple’s relationship as balanced, symmetrical, and beautiful. In “Conjoined” the speaker uses the unnatural as comparison to her marriage and to give a negative connotation. The speaker tells of a two-headed calf and Siamese twins, “An accident, like the two-headed calf rooted in one body, fighting to suck at its mother’s teats; or those other freaks, joined at the chest by skin and muscle, doomed to live, even make love, together for sixty years.” She sees her marriage as an accident and that it was not to be. The couple is conjoined like the calf and the twins but they are not of the same mind. Like the calf, they are fighting to get nourishment so they can develop and grow. Just like the Siamese twins conjoined at the chest and are seemed “doomed” the speaker sees that her marriage is doomed because the only thing that is keeping them together is marriage. They are individuals and in one body and they are fighting for space. The connotation is distasteful because of the words “doomed,” “fighting,” and “freaks.” The negative connotation causes the reader to view the marriage as hopeless and that the couple is suffocating each other by being so close to each other. They are hindering each other and not helping each other to grow because of this bound that they have. It has not helped them to be one in spirit but one in the physical. The speaker knows that in order for this bound to work, the couple must be of the same mind and not just bound physically.


The poems see marriage as a bound that needs to be less about the physical bound and more about the spiritual and psychological bound. Donne’s poem saw that marriage is more than the physical and is that the couple have this emotional aristocracy because they consider their love higher than other couples. The separation will not interfere with their marriage because they are one in spirit. Minty’s poem suggests that marriage needs to be more than a physical bound and a couple needs to be one in understanding. If they are individuals and are bound only physically, then they will fight each other and their marriage will seem like an accident or freak.

4 comments:

  1. 1. i dont see a thesis stated. in your opening paragraph you are summarizing the poems but you dont explain what figurative language is used to help explain the greater meaning of the work. i think a more clear argument needs to be identified before moving further with your essay.
    2. i think there is a lot of clear evidence that you did a close reading of the poem. you also used very nice lead ins to your many quotations. i thought your essay was a well understanding of the two poems but the whole time i was reading it i was unclear about the argument you were trying to make regarding the prompt.
    3. the use of quotes and their explanations did help with your understanding of the poems meaning but not with the prompt. they helped me to come across the idea that marriage was either good or bad and that separation was bound to happen in both but i wasn't sure if that was what you were trying to get to. also you could have used other figurative language.
    4. the only evident devices you discussed were metaphors. but you could have done more to go with the prompt.
    5. i didnt think you had any misinterpretations of the poem.except for in the opening sentence of the essay you said that separation was beneficial in both poems but in valediction the author wasnt trying to say that their seperation was beneficial just that it would be different than any one else's.
    6. if there is any questions i would ask it would be:
    how did the authors' literary devices contribute to the greater meaning? what is your argument? are there any other devices other than metaphors that you can talk about?
    7. i didnt know where your body's seperated or if it was meant to be just one body so that confused me but other than that it was really good. nicee job. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1. Connie's thesis is that the authors use metaphors and connotation to express how one couple's love is more than physical, and the others' marriage is a hindering bond.The whole intro explains what each poem is about, and it is effectively written.
    2. You do a good job of close reading, almost everything is either a quote or what it means. you didn't use much from Valediction besides the compass quote, so maybe there could be more, but it doesn't really seem like you need more evidence, there's enough.
    3. Yes, you worked analyze the quotes. You didn't just say they mean this just because, you actually looked into the metaphors and the words of the quotes, so you supported what you were saying.
    4. Like I said in the previous answers, yes, you did explain how the literary devices, you chose metaphors and connotation, supported your thesis and contributed to the poems and their meanings.
    5. No, I don't think there were any misinterpretations. Everything that you took from the quotes were reasonable interpretations, and made sense.
    6. What was the tone of Valediction, if Conjoined had a negative connotation?
    Were there any other devises, besides metaphors, that were used in the poems?
    If the relationship in Conjoined is unnatural, then is the one in Valediction natural, or just better?

    ReplyDelete
  3. 1. Your thesis is how the authors use literary devices say how they feel about relationships. With the addition of their specific feelings, this is just what the prompt said. Try to go a little further with perhaps what their opinions reveal. What you have is right, just add a little more.

    2. You do a very good job with the close reading. And I like how you don't just have a paragraph for each poem. However, in the second paragraph, I don't think you connected the two poems together. Why are those two examples in the same paragraph.

    3. Yes. I think I exaplained this in #2.

    4. Definately the metaphors. And I like the negative connotation you brought in for conjoined. How is that different from the diction in Valediction?

    5.No.

    6. What do the greater meanings of the work reveal?
    Is there a bigger message besides how they feel about love?
    Can you find connotations in the other poem? What kind?

    ReplyDelete
  4. The comments that I received on my essay were good in that I saw that I did not provide a clear enough thesis and I could have gone deeper in the greater meaning of the works and how each of the literary devices help to make the greater meaning more transparent and clear. It was helpful and I revised my thesis to make it clear and give a better argument in my essay. By reading other people's essays I got more ideas and a better understanding of the poems and saw some interesting points made and caused me to think about what I said in my essay. The essays also gave me a different ideas of the poems. Some of the points made by my peers I did not think of before.By reading my peer's essays and reading what they had to say about my essay caused me to think more critical of my essay and also to put some more and different ideas in my essay. I revised my essay to become more clear because my peers said that at times I was not so clear with what I said and my thesis. I liked how in class we went over essay and the issue about summary came up. I always thought that I little bit of background was ok in an essay because it sets up quotes and helps your ideas to come out better. So I changed a little bit of how I summarized and made the times when I summarized to be more brief and instead of just stating what happened to be informative. Also, I discussed the essay with poem of my friends and I heard what the poem meant to them and what they saw in the poem and what they were considering writing their essay on. I made my thesis clearer and more arguable. I defined what each literary device was used and how it helped the greater meaning of the work to come out better. I also added more points to my essay because I got more ideas over the past week of talking it over with people in class. I do feel that the essay is better developed and more direct in what I am trying to say in the essay and what the greater meaning of the poem is. I can use this process in future writing and just going over my essay more and being more critical on how each point is being made and if the greater meaning of the work is coming out better.

    ReplyDelete